Swing Voter, Floating Voter, Party Faithful, Which Are You? UK General Election 2010
65
Does my vote count anyway?
I love politics. Can't tell you why exactly. I just feel drawn to the concept of opposing groups of people with their own various agendas chipping away at each other through debate. All those points made and lost. I even like foreign politics. I want to know what people have to say and what makes them say it.
Perhaps it's in my genes. My great grandfather sat in the Houses of Parliament in London in the 20s and 30s, noting down the business of the day, then transmitting news articles via Morse Code, if you please! He, like me, loved politics in all it's forms, and liked nothing better tthan to continue debating after hours in whatever journalistic watering hole he happened to find himself in.
One of the seriously huge things that fascinates me most is how people choose their affiliations. Why do people vote what they vote. In fact, why do people vote at all?
Here in Britain we're daily nudging closer to the 2010 general election. We have an unelected and unpopular Prime Minister leading a party that has grown stale in office. There's a world wide recession, and lots of voters want change. The thinking seems to be, well if this lot haven't sorted things out, perhaps the other lot might do better. A huge chunk of the population will dutifully trudge down to the polls on the appointed day and make their mark, but what will they vote? What would you vote? What kind of a voter are you?
The Swing Voter, or Floating Voter
These guys are like gold-dust to the career politician. They not only have minds, they can change them too! The floating voter is a challenge. An enigma. They are the political equivalent of a heathen waiting to discover Christianity. Or a punter checking out the horses at the race track, and hoping to choose the winner. Will their vote change the world, and tip chaos into order? Floating voters watch the new American-style tv debates with rapt attention, patiently devouring every word, and maybe even taking notes!
The floating voter is courted with promises of tax cuts, better schools, better roads, better health-care. Give us your vote, and your newly elected government will deliver the goods. Maybe.
The Old Faithful Voter
The Old Faithful Voter doesn't think too hard about politics. He or she just sticks their cross in the same party box that their parents did, and their grand-parents before them. If you try pointing out that the country has changed a little since Churchill's day (or Roosevelt's, or Gandhi's etc, etc) they just look at you with a blank, faraway expression in their eyes. They are voting out of brand loyalty and because of family tradition. These people prefer to stick to the tried and trusted. Generation after generation.
The Capricious Voter
These voters are the kind of people who give their children names like Tinkerbell and Javelin. They like to be different. The political persuasion of their chosen candidate matters a darn sight less than whether he or she drives a pink car, or has fifteen letters in their sir-name, or happens to be born in the year of the Tiger. This voter could be won over by the right choice of campaign song ('Things Can Only Get Better', or 'The Only Way is Up' or maybe, 'Jesus wants me for a SunBeam') After all it's the little things that count.
The Tactical Voter
This voter hasn't a clue about policy either. He's confused about the issues, but he knows that he doesn't like the current administration. If he votes for the other main party he'll be breaking life-long loyalties, and he can't bring himself to do that, so he'll vote for one of the other parties, or maybe even for one of the other, other parties, like the greens or the Monster Raving Loonies. That'll be one in the eye for the government. Yeah, that'll teach 'em!
What Kind of Voter Are You?
Would you say that you are mostly
See results without voting|
|
NEW The U.S. Constitution - Hillsdale College Politics
Current Bid: $26.09
|
|
|
1824 Niles Weekly Register Bound Vol. History,Politics
Current Bid: $37.75
|
|
|
1821-1822 Niles Weekly Register Bound Vol. History,Politics
Current Bid: $38.00
|
|
|
ELECT REAGAN IN 68 FOR PRESIDENT POLITICAL CAMPAIGN PIN
Current Bid: $6.00
|
|
|
1823-1824 Niles Weekly Register Bound Vol. History,Politics
Current Bid: $38.00
|
![]() | Amazon Price: $14.49 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $9.57 List Price: $18.95 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $12.80 List Price: $20.95 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $0.00 |
CommentsLoading...
I was a Labour man all my life, until Tony Blair got in. Since then I've been effectively disenfranchised, as there is no true Labour Party left. So I'm a capricious voter now I guess. Last time it was the Money Reform party, the time before that the Legalise Cannabis Party. Both times I was the election agent. Talk about backing a lost cause!
I pretty much vote the left, as far left as i can in the U.S., which isn't very far. It's not that I hold strong political views so much as I'm tired of all the greed and BS over here, plus I think people should be able to be who they are without being harrassed constantly. Thanks for asking!
Wow, really? Oh no! LOL! Seriously, it's pretty weird over here lately. I think compared to some of the voters in the U.S. most Brits and Europeans come off looking like the Red Menace. At least we can laugh about it here at HP--that helps a bit. I used to think of myself as fairly moderate too, but now I understand I am a foaming at the mouth commie, so welcome!
Hey Amanda, I too like politics but am confused as to why. If I like it so much, why not get involved, I wonder to myself. However, I find that the parties fluctuate in their beliefs so much that I can't possibly commit to either Republican or Democrat and I don't want to throw my vote by going Green at this point.
I am stuck on issues. Whomever happens to be on the side of my issues during any given voting season gets my vote, lol. I would say that I am a Compassionate Conservative- if there were such a thing, though many would call me a Ranting Radical, which always cracks me up.
I'm a political junkie, too. I like your hub, and I've given it a thumbs up, but my views are far different from those you express here. I'm a staunch advocate of the two-party system here in the U.S. There's a vast difference between the philosphies of the Democrats and Republicans, which I won't detail here (I've done so in several hubs.) While individual candidates may not be ideal, it would be foolish for me to vote for a Republican no matter how intelligent or moderate he/she might be because that person would support virtually everything I oppose. There will always be liberals and conservatives. There's no way around it. You are either on one side or the other. There is no middle ground. Voting for third parties is like sticking your head in the sand.
whoa!! did you say your name was william Tory?? lol just kidding...I totally disagree...there are way more than JUST 2 PARTIES/ the problem is US brand of politics with the popular vote counting as zip/remember the snafu with wfbush first election/and electoral votes ...all of us are looking at he district of columbia through rose colored glasses if we think our votes counts!! it depends on how many electoral votes your states have and who is in control of those votes dem or rep...still I have voted acutally...twice...once for nixon and once for j mccain...so as you can see once I voted the way my father told me to(old faithful) and once I voted with my heart(swing)
I'm a bit out of touch with UK politics because here in Qatar we hear mostly about international politics (and military actions), with particular focus on the Gulf hotspots, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria. No Qatari politics of course because it's a wholly benign dictatorship (that also owns the media ;)
I've often voted Liberal when in UK, sometimes Labour, never Tory. And, like you, I find American politics (or at least political rhetoric) very strange.
Hi, Amanda! Here's another political junkie, and I'm not sure where the love of the game comes from, certainly not from a family member being in the business!
I'm closer to a swing voter, but I'd call it more like "voter of principles" :P I don't vote out of affiliation nor out of trying to piss off the current party in office, I think I vote mostly based on two factors, to put it simplistically: what's closer to my way of seeing life and issues (pulls my vote) AND promises unfulfilled or dishonesty shown (pushes my vote and I may end up with a blank vote in my hands).
I think it is a good idea to read the party manifesto and vote for the party that seems most aligned to your points of view, not that they do what they say they will very often. I suspect that people vote more on personalities these days, Big Brother has a lot to answer for, how many times have you heard I just liked that one!! Oh well, just my opinion.
Well written and informative Hub...Thank you
Many folks just aren't that interested in politics like some of us.... these folks vote instinctively, emotionally, and probably rely on name recognition for many of their votes...this is not necessarily a bad thing; at least they are voting...you can't bitch if you don't vote....
I guess in the long run, you always get the government you deserve....
I vote strictly on the issues. I not only vote, I am actively involved in politics.
Here in the US, the 2 major parties represent a completely opposite worldview these days. It didn't use to be this way. In the 1950s and 1960s, the differences were more subtle. The big change happened when the Radical Left took control of the Democratic Party in the 1972 election cycle—where they were promptly trounced.
I have never voted for any candidate who is not Pro-Life.
Fun political hub! I'm both a swing and capricious voter! That is I vote for the person I figure will tighten the nuts and bolts correctly..
Hi Amanda, no I haven't. That's because I'm working on a very important project which I'll talk about in due time. I'm a swing voter but I like the ideals behind the democratic party in my country the most. No, unfortunately my country has such outlandish, vitrolic, traumatizing elections that it's hard to pay attention to what's going on elsewhere. But now that you mention it, I will be paying attention to the elections in the UK.
I am the swing voter, but I don't know about being courted. I am one of those people that so many hate.lolololo :D
I am a liberal Democrat because I actually have supported the issues of nationalized health care and other more left wing policies for awhile. I agree the US is primarily a two party system, and the only time a third party candidate actually had somewhat of a chance is when Ross Perot ran in 1992. However, his dropping out of the race, and reappearing again confused a lot of voters, and many people did not want to throw their votes away.
I did like some of his policies, and I actually did agree with his stance on NAFTA, even though many thought it was silly at the time. So overall I am a liberal Democrat, but I have appreciate some more conservative politicians such as Perot.
What an interesting hub! I'm a floating voter, I think. I certainly am not one of those people who would vote for a dishcloth if it were blue, or a donkey if it sang the Red Flag.
Like you also, from reading on hubpages I've discovered I'm not centre-right, but Stalinist.

























ethel smith Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago
I too love politics, in my own way :) Fancy an MP in the family.